A. Lobo et al., Analysis of fine-scale spatial pattern of a grassland from remotely-sensedimagery and field collected data, LANDSC ECOL, 13(2), 1998, pp. 111-131
An important practical problem in the analysis of spatial pattern in ecolog
ical systems is that requires spatially-intensive data, with both fine reso
lution and large extent. Such information is often difficult to obtain from
field-measured variables. Digital imagery can offer a valuable, alternativ
e source of information in the analysis of ecological pattern. In the prese
nt paper, we use remotely-sensed imagery to provide a link between field-ba
sed information and spatially-explicit modeling of ecological processes. We
analyzed one digitized color infrared aerial photograph of a serpentine gr
assland to develop a detailed digital map of land cover categories (31.24 m
x 50.04 m of extent and 135 mm of resolution), and an image of vegetation
index (proportional to the amount of green biomass cover in the field). We
conducted a variogram analysis of the spatial pattern of both field-measure
d (microtopography, soil depth) and image-derived (land cover map, vegetati
on index, gopher disturbance) landscape variables, and used a statistical s
imulation method to produce random realizations of the image of vegetation
index based upon our characterization of its spatial structure. The analysi
s revealed strong relationships in the spatial distribution of the ecologic
al variables (e.g., gopher mounds and perennial grasses are found primarily
on deeper soils) and a non-fractal nested spatial pattern in the distribut
ion of green biomass as measured by the vegetation index. The spatial patte
rn of the vegetation index was composed of three basic components: an expon
ential trend from 0 m to 4 m, which is related to local ecological processe
s, a linear trend at broader scales, which is related to a general change i
n topography across the study site, and a superimposed periodic structure,
which is related to the regular spacing of deeper soils within the study si
te. Simulations of the image of vegetation index confirmed our interpretati
on of the variograms. The simulations also illustrated the limits Of statis
tical analysis and interpolations based solely on the semivariogram, becaus
e they cannot adequately characterize spatial discontinuities.