Development of potential acid sulfate paleosols in Paleocene floodplains, Bighorn Basin, Wyoming, USA

Authors
Citation
Mj. Kraus, Development of potential acid sulfate paleosols in Paleocene floodplains, Bighorn Basin, Wyoming, USA, PALAEOGEO P, 144(1-2), 1998, pp. 203-224
Citations number
67
Categorie Soggetti
Earth Sciences
Journal title
PALAEOGEOGRAPHY PALAEOCLIMATOLOGY PALAEOECOLOGY
ISSN journal
00310182 → ACNP
Volume
144
Issue
1-2
Year of publication
1998
Pages
203 - 224
Database
ISI
SICI code
0031-0182(19981115)144:1-2<203:DOPASP>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
Floodplain paleosols in the Paleocene Fort Union Formation in the Bighorn B asin are distinguished by a dark claystone interval with yellow jarosite mo ttles, relatively high total organic carbon values, and woody debris and le aves along bedding planes. The paleosols also have various redoximorphic fe atures, including low matrix chromas, grey root mottles, and local concentr ations of goethite and hematite, especially associated with roots and other organic matter. Jarosite is usually an oxidation product of pyrite, which forms under waterlogged conditions when sulfate and organic matter are avai lable. The former presence of pyrite and the redoximorphic features suggest that the Fort Union paleosols first developed as potential acid sulfate so ils (Brinkman and Pens, 1973). The dark claystones with jarosite are interp reted as permanently reduced or Gr horizons. The Gr horizon is overlain by mudstone that is lighter colored and lacks jarosite. This represents an anc ient Bg horizon or A/Bg sequence. The jarosite indicates that the paleosols underwent a subsequent episode of oxidation and acidification. Those proce sses require that the soils be drained, which probably did not occur during Paleocene time and may be a recent event. Rather, the soils were probably buried as the Fort Union Formation continued to aggrade, and the waterlogge d soils were pushed even farther below the groundwater table. Only with lat e Cenozoic excavation of strata in the basin and exposure of the Fort Union deposits, did jarosite precipitate. Pedogenic and paleobotanical features suggest that the soils formed in floodplain swamps dominated by coniferous trees. The high organic content and clay-rich nature of the Gr horizons sug gest that the floodplain swamps were not close to the active channel. The b ipartite nature to the profiles (Bg horizon or A/Bg sequence above a Gr hor izon) probably resulted from two different kinds of floodplain deposition. Grain size trends indicate that the Gr horizons formed on sediment deposite d by overbank flooding. The impermeable, fine-grained sediment and its low topographic position led to waterlogging. The overlying A/Bg or Bg horizons formed on coarser sediment that was probably deposited during channel avul sion. The greater permeability and higher topographic position of this sedi ment caused it to be better drained than the Gr horizon. The paleosols are unusual because they formed in a freshwater setting, whereas modern potenti al acid sulfate or acid sulfate soils form in coastal areas where sulfate i s readily available. The source of the sulfate may have been Cretaceous mar ine shales, exposed along the flanks of mountains rising around the Bighorn Basin during Paleocene time. Other Upper Cretaceous and Paleocene formatio ns in the Rocky Mountain area contain similar rocks, suggesting that sulfid ic soils were relatively common in the mid-continent at this time. Most of these other examples probably reflect deposition associated with the retrea ting Western Interior Seaway and humid climates. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.