The recent decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in Kansas v. Hendricks (1997)
will focus increased attention on the legal, social science, and clinical
issues related to sexual offenders. Such issues include the risk of recidiv
ism by sexual offenders, the extent to which this risk is reduced through t
reatment, and the degree to which assessment and treatment of sexual offend
ers can be informed by social science data and is relevant for legal decisi
on making. The authors critically review the research on sexual offender re
cidivism and the impact of treatment on such recidivism, and analyze the le
gal decision-making contexts that characterize the decisions facing courts
concerning sexual offenders. The authors then describe a clinical decisionm
aking model with the potential for linking assessment with interventions fo
r sexual offenders, in a way that can facilitate relevance and accuracy in
decision making for both clinicians and courts.