Validity in qualitative inquiry and the problem of criteria: Implications for sport psychology

Evaluating the quality of qualitative inquiry has begun to intrigue researc hers in sport psychology. Consequently, this has raised important questions regarding the criteria for judging this emerging form of inquiry. With the intent to stimulate methodological debate, this paper explores prevailing notions of validity in qualitative sport psychology by focusing on how vari ous scholars have framed this term. The prevailing parallel perspective of validity is discussed, as are specific problems associated with this view I n contrast recent attempts to reconceptualize validity in relation to parti cular forms of qualitative inquiry are considered. The socially constructed nature of validity and the multiplicity of meanings associated with this t erm are presented according to a diversification perspective. More radical calls to renounce validity and seek alternative criteria for judging qualit ative inquiry are also discussed. In closing, the ongoing problem of criter ia and its implications for research in sport psychology are considered.