This paper attempts to provide a descriptive theoretical overview of the me
dical futility debate. I will first argue that quantitative data cannot alo
ne resolve the medical futility debate. I will then examine two aspects of
medical futility, which I call the prospective and immediate, respectively.
The first involves making prospective factual and value judgments about th
e efficacy of proposed medical interventions, while the latter involves mak
ing value judgments about ongoing medical conditions where the clinical dat
a are clear. At stake is the nature and scope of individual rights. Thus, I
maintain there is an undeveloped aspect to the medical futility debate and
, briefly, analyze two political perspectives which give rise to different
understandings of medical futility. The view that I will defend is that onl
y a system with defined collective goals can accommodate a normative concep
t of medical futility. These larger questions are the value options which,
if unaddressed, may be settled by default of economic grounds.