Ew. Hill et al., What is a central city in the United States? Applying a statistical technique for developing taxonomies, URBAN STUD, 35(11), 1998, pp. 1935-1969
We test the null hypothesis that municipalities defined as central cities b
y the US Bureau of the Census in 1990 are homogeneous-a hypothesis we rejec
t. Rather, we find that US central cities consist of 2 distinct subsets of
municipalities that are aggregated from 13 cluster groupings. The article h
as two purposes. The first is methodological. We develop a method that uses
cluster analysis to group US central cities; then we employ discriminant a
nalysis to establish the statistical validity of those groups. We also deve
lop techniques to minimise the role of judgement in selecting the appropria
te cluster solution. The second purpose of the article is to test the subst
antive null hypothesis. Our rejection of the homogeneity assumption raises
the spectre of specification error in research and public policies that ass
ume homogeneity among central cities.