Rm. Macklis et al., Brief courses of palliative radiotherapy for metastatic bone pain - A pilot cost-minimization comparison with narcotic analgesics, AM J CL ONC, 21(6), 1998, pp. 617-622
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS
The use of radiotherapy to treat metastatic bone pain is being challenged b
y claims of high cost and by more readily available, noninvasive treatment
approaches. The authors assessed the effectiveness of brief courses of radi
otherapy in reducing pain and estimated cost data for a pilot comparison be
tween radiotherapy and narcotic analgesics in patients with cancer. A repre
sentative group of outpatients undergoing brief courses of radiotherapy wit
h Karnofsky scores above 70 and without serious comorbidities were recruite
d from 1995 through 1996. Patients indicated their pain at rest and with mo
vement on a scale of from 1 to 10 both before and up to 12 months after rad
iotherapy. Radiotherapy costs were estimated from Medicare-allowable charge
s. Narcotic analgesia costs were estimated from published values. In 66 pat
ients with 131 individually treated sites, median at rest pain score decrea
sed by about 4 points after treatment (5.58 [+/-3.28] before treatment vs.
1.55 [+/-1.8] after treatment; p < 0.05). Median with movement pain score w
as about 5 points lower after treatment (7.32 [+/-2.72] before treatment vs
. 1.94 [+/-2.07] after treatment; p < 0.05). No differences were found when
stratifying by type of pain, tumor histologic type, or skeletal site. The
estimated cost per patient ranged from $1,200 to $2,500 for radiotherapy. T
his compares with an estimated cost of $9,000 to $36,000 for 9 months of na
rcotics. In this pilot study, a brief course of radiotherapy significantly
reduced pain and appeared to be cost effective when compared with narcotic
analgesia. A full economic evaluation is warranted.