T. Propst et al., Reinforced intradermal hepatitis B vaccination in hemodialysis patients issuperior in antibody response to intramuscular or subcutaneous vaccination, AM J KIDNEY, 32(6), 1998, pp. 1041-1045
Since 1960, hepatitis B virus-associated chronic liver disease has been con
sidered an important problem in dialysis units in both Europe and North Ame
rica. Separate dialysis facilities for hepatitis B-infected patients, the i
mplementation of universal precautions for the prevention of transmission,
and the active immunization against hepatitis B have now reduced the yearly
incidence to less than 0.05% in Western countries. However, only 50% to 60
% of patients with renal insufficiency develop sufficient immune response a
fter intramuscular hepatitis B vaccination. The aim of the current study wa
s to determine whether the mode of Vaccine application plays a role in vacc
ination response and whether increasing the vaccine dose of primary intrade
rmal hepatitis B vaccination can reduce the number of Vaccine injections in
hemodialysis patients. We designed a prospective, randomized study of anti
body responses to hepatitis B vaccine given intradermally, subcutaneously,
or intramuscularly in 81 hemodialysis patients. Outcome measures were rates
of seroconversion, mean levels of anti-Hbs antibodies, and antibody revels
8 years after vaccination. The results show that intradermal hepatitis B v
accination response with a higher vaccination dose than previously used in
hemodialysis patients is superior to conventional intramuscular and subcuta
neous Vaccination and is also well tolerated. Five intradermal injections o
f 20 mu g each induced the development of sufficient anti-Hbs antibody tite
r, which persisted in 70% of the patients over 3 years. (C) 1998 by the Nat
ional Kidney Foundation, Inc.