Differences in airway closure between normal and asthmatic subjects measured with single-photon emission computed tomography and technegas

Citation
Gg. King et al., Differences in airway closure between normal and asthmatic subjects measured with single-photon emission computed tomography and technegas, AM J R CRIT, 158(6), 1998, pp. 1900-1906
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","da verificare
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
ISSN journal
1073449X → ACNP
Volume
158
Issue
6
Year of publication
1998
Pages
1900 - 1906
Database
ISI
SICI code
1073-449X(199812)158:6<1900:DIACBN>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
The absence of a maximal dose-response plateau as well as gas trapping and increases in closing capacity (CC) suggest that increased airway closure is an important mechanical abnormality of asthmatic airways. We compared the extent and distribution of airway closure in 13 normal and in 23 asthmatic subjects. Airway closure (LVclosed) was measured with single-photon emissio n computed tomography (SPECT) and an inhaled Technegas bolus as the percent age of lung volume without Technegas (LVtrans), and with CC, using nitrogen washout. LVclosed was compared in the apical, middle and lower zones, each being of equal vertical height. Values of mean LVclosed +/- 95% confidence interval (CI) were similar in normal (30 +/- 6.0% LVtrans) and asthmatic s ubjects (30 +/- 7.8% LVtrans), In normal subjects, LVclosed correlated with both age (r = 0.89, p < 0.01) and CC (r = 0.86, p < 0.01), was more extens ive in the lower zone (58 +/- 18.8% LVtrans, p < 0.01) than in the middle a nd upper zones (17 +/- 8.7% and 26 +/- 8.2 LVtrans, respectively), and incr eased with age in both the middle and lower zones (r = 0.94 and r = 0.90, r espectively, p < 0.01). In asthmatic subjects, LVclosed did not correlate w ith age; was greatest in the lower zone, intermediate in the middle zone, a nd lowest in the apical zone (59 +/- 13.2%, 22 +/- 5.8%, and 12 +/- 4.4% LV trans, respectively, p < 0.01); and correlated weakly with age in the middl e zone only (r = 0.46, p < 0.05). We conclude that there is a predictable p attern of airway closure in normal subjects and that it is primarily influe nced by pulmonary elastic recoil. This pattern is lost in asthmatic subject s. This may be explained by an increased range of closing pressures and a p atchy distribution of airway closure, probably secondary to allergic inflam mation.