Gg. King et al., Differences in airway closure between normal and asthmatic subjects measured with single-photon emission computed tomography and technegas, AM J R CRIT, 158(6), 1998, pp. 1900-1906
The absence of a maximal dose-response plateau as well as gas trapping and
increases in closing capacity (CC) suggest that increased airway closure is
an important mechanical abnormality of asthmatic airways. We compared the
extent and distribution of airway closure in 13 normal and in 23 asthmatic
subjects. Airway closure (LVclosed) was measured with single-photon emissio
n computed tomography (SPECT) and an inhaled Technegas bolus as the percent
age of lung volume without Technegas (LVtrans), and with CC, using nitrogen
washout. LVclosed was compared in the apical, middle and lower zones, each
being of equal vertical height. Values of mean LVclosed +/- 95% confidence
interval (CI) were similar in normal (30 +/- 6.0% LVtrans) and asthmatic s
ubjects (30 +/- 7.8% LVtrans), In normal subjects, LVclosed correlated with
both age (r = 0.89, p < 0.01) and CC (r = 0.86, p < 0.01), was more extens
ive in the lower zone (58 +/- 18.8% LVtrans, p < 0.01) than in the middle a
nd upper zones (17 +/- 8.7% and 26 +/- 8.2 LVtrans, respectively), and incr
eased with age in both the middle and lower zones (r = 0.94 and r = 0.90, r
espectively, p < 0.01). In asthmatic subjects, LVclosed did not correlate w
ith age; was greatest in the lower zone, intermediate in the middle zone, a
nd lowest in the apical zone (59 +/- 13.2%, 22 +/- 5.8%, and 12 +/- 4.4% LV
trans, respectively, p < 0.01); and correlated weakly with age in the middl
e zone only (r = 0.46, p < 0.05). We conclude that there is a predictable p
attern of airway closure in normal subjects and that it is primarily influe
nced by pulmonary elastic recoil. This pattern is lost in asthmatic subject
s. This may be explained by an increased range of closing pressures and a p
atchy distribution of airway closure, probably secondary to allergic inflam
mation.