A randomized, double blind trial for stress ulcer prophylaxis shows no evidence of increased pneumonia

Citation
Ew. Hanisch et al., A randomized, double blind trial for stress ulcer prophylaxis shows no evidence of increased pneumonia, AM J SURG, 176(5), 1998, pp. 453-457
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,"Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
ISSN journal
00029610 → ACNP
Volume
176
Issue
5
Year of publication
1998
Pages
453 - 457
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9610(199811)176:5<453:ARDBTF>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
BACKGROUND: H-2-receptor antagonists are commonly used for stress ulcer pro phylaxis on intensive, sive care units. However, there is evidence that via the route of an elevated gastric pH, followed by bacterial overgrowth and subsequent tracheal aspiration, pneumonia could occur. In line with this as sumption total gastrectomized patients should develop a very high incidence of pneumonia, which is actually not the case. We therefore formulated the hypothesis that stress ulcer prophylaxis with H-2-receptor antagonists does not lead to an increased pneumonia rate. METHODS: A total of 158 patients with mechanical ventilation greater than o r equal to 48 hours of a surgical intensive care unit were randomized to th e following groups: A, placebo (n = 57); B, pirenzepine (3 x 10 mg intraven ously, n = 44); and C, ranitidine (3 x 50 nag intravenously, n = 57). RESULTS: The pneumonia rate in ranitidine-, pirenzepine-, and placebo-treat ed patients is 10 of 57, 10 of 44, and 112 of 57, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Pneumonia rate is not adversely affected by H-2-receptor antag onists in stress ulcer prophylaxis. Am J Surg. 1998;176:453-457. (C) 1998 b y Excerpta Medica, Inc.