Anorectal reconstruction by colo-perineal anastomosis and dynamic double graciloplasty after abdominoperitoneal resection.

Citation
E. Rullier et al., Anorectal reconstruction by colo-perineal anastomosis and dynamic double graciloplasty after abdominoperitoneal resection., ANN CHIR, 52(9), 1998, pp. 905-912
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
ANNALES DE CHIRURGIE
ISSN journal
00033944 → ACNP
Volume
52
Issue
9
Year of publication
1998
Pages
905 - 912
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-3944(1998)52:9<905:ARBCAA>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the technical and functional results of total anorectal reconstruction with double dynamic graciloplasty after abd ominoperineal resection (APR). Patients and method's. From May 1995 to Dece mber 1996, 10 patients (6 males and 4 females), with a mean age of 54 years (range 39-74), underwent anorectal reconstruction for low rectal adenocarc inoma. All patients had preoperative radiotherapy and six had postoperative chemotherapy. The surgical procedure was performed in three stages: 1) APR , coloperineal anastomosis, double graciloplasty and ileostomy; 2) three mo nths later, implantation of stimulator and leads; 3) after a two-months tra ining period, the stoma was closed. Results. There was no postoperative mor tality. Early and late morbidity occurred in 5 patients : 2 colonic fistula s, 1 necrosis of colon, 1 ileostomy prolapse, 1 neosphincter stenosis, 1 se psis of stimulator. No patient had recurrence of the disease (mean follow-u p 16 months), but two patients died at 3 and 8 months, respectively from an orexia and pulmonary embolism, Seven patients were available for evaluation (2 fistula, 1 death). Before training, the resting pressure and the squeez e pressure were 30 and 175 cm H2O respectively. At the time of evaluation, the electrical stimulated pressure was 95 cm H2O. Six of these 7 patients w ere continent (5 with spontaneous defecation, 1 with enemas) and 1 was inco ntinent. Conclusions: Anorectal reconstruction with dynamic graciloplasty c an be an alternative to permanent colostomy for selected patients after APR . However, there is a high morbidity and the quality of life of the patient s must be evaluated.