Extended drainage versus resection in surgery for chronic pancreatitis - Aprospective randomized trial comparing the longitudinal pancreaticojejunostomy combined with local pancreatic head excision with the pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy
Jr. Izbicki et al., Extended drainage versus resection in surgery for chronic pancreatitis - Aprospective randomized trial comparing the longitudinal pancreaticojejunostomy combined with local pancreatic head excision with the pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy, ANN SURG, 228(6), 1998, pp. 771-779
Objective
To analyze the efficacy of extended drainage-that is, longitudinal pancreat
icojejunostomy combined with local pancreatic head excision (LPJ-LPHE)-and
pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy (PPPD) in terms of pain relief, co
ntrol of complications arising from adjacent organs, and quality of life.
Summary Background Data
Based on the hypotheses of pain origin (ductal hypertension and perineural
inflammatory infiltration), drainage and resection constitute the main prin
ciples of surgery for chronic pancreatitis,
Methods
Sixty-one patients were randomly allocated to either LPJ-LPHE (n = 31) or P
PPD (n = 30). The interval between symptoms and surgery ranged from 12 mont
hs to 10 years (mean 5.1 years). In addition to routine pancreatic diagnost
ic workup, a multidimensional psychometric quality-of-life questionnaire an
d a pain score were used. Endocrine and exocrine functions were assessed in
terms of oral glucose tolerance and serum concentrations of insulin, C-pep
tide, and HbA(1c), as well as fecal chymotrypsin and pancreolauryl testing.
During a median follow-up of 24 months (range 12 to 36), patients were rea
ssessed in the outpatient clinic.
Results
One patient died of cardiovascular failure in the LPJ-LPHE group (3.2%); th
ere were no deaths in the PPPD group. Over ail, the rate of in-hospital com
plications was 19.4% in the LPJ-LPHE group and 53.3% in the PPPD group, inc
luding delayed gastric emptying in 9 of 30 patients (30%; p < 0.05). Compli
cations of adjacent organs were definitively resolved in 93.5% in the LPJ-L
PHE group and in 100% in the PPPD group. The pain score decreased by 94% af
ter LPJ-LPHE and by 95% after PPPD. Global quality of life improved by 71%
in the LPJ-LPHE group and by 43% in the PPPD group (p < 0.01).
Conclusions
Both procedures are equally effective in terms of pain relief and definitiv
e control of complications affecting adjacent organs, but extended drainage
by LPJ-LPHE provides a better quality of life.