Bacteriological efficacies of three macrolides compared with those of amoxicillin-clavulanate against Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae
V. Berry et al., Bacteriological efficacies of three macrolides compared with those of amoxicillin-clavulanate against Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae, ANTIM AG CH, 42(12), 1998, pp. 3193-3199
Comparative antibacterial efficacies of erythromycin, clarithromycin, and a
zithromycin were examined against Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus
influenzae, with amoxicillin-clavulanate used as the active control. In vit
ro, the macrolides at twice their MICs and at concentrations achieved in hu
mans were bacteriostatic or reduced the numbers of viable S. pneumoniae slo
wly, whereas amoxicillin-clavulanate showed a rapid antibacterial effect. A
gainst H. influenzae, erythromycin, clarithromycin, and clarithromycin plus
14-hydroxy clarithromycin at twice their MICs produced a slow reduction in
bacterial numbers, whereas azithromycin was bactericidal. Azithromycin at
the concentrations achieved in the serum of humans was bacteriostatic, wher
eas erythromycin and clarithromycin were ineffective. In experimental respi
ratory tract infections in rats, clarithromycin (equivalent to 250 mg twice
daily [b.i.d.]) and amoxicillin-clavulanate (equivalent to 500 plus 125 mg
b.i.d., respectively) were highly effective against S. pneumoniae, but azi
thromycin (equivalent to 500 and 250 mg once daily) was significantly less
effective (P < 0.01). Against H. influenzae, clarithromycin treatment (equi
valent to 250 or 500 mg b.i.d.) was similar to no treatment and was signifi
cantly less effective than amoxicillin-clavulanate treatment (P < 0.01). Az
ithromycin demonstrated significant in vivo activity (P < 0.05) but was sig
nificantly less effective than amoxicillin-clavulanate (P < 0.05), Overall,
amoxicillin-clavulanate was effective in vitro and in vive. Clarithromycin
and erythromycin were ineffective in vitro and in vive against H. influenz
ae, and azithromycin (at concentrations achieved in humans) showed unreliab
le activity against both pathogens. These results may have clinical implica
tions for the utility of macrolides in the empiric therapy of respiratory t
ract infections.