Objective: To determine the efficacy of obstacle course performance scores
in predicting persons at risk for falls, after adjusting for age, sociodemo
graphic, health-status, and physiologic variables.
Design: Correlational descriptive study design utilizing a logistic regress
ion model.
Setting: Community setting.
Patients or Participants: A convenience sample of 352 community-dwelling el
derly individuals at sites in a metropolitan area.
Main Criterion Measure: Number of falls reported prospectively during a 2-y
ear follow-up period.
Results: Obstacle course performance, fall history, symptoms of balance dys
function, and activity level distinguished those who fell and those who did
not 12 and 18 months later. At 24 months, range of motion and number of me
dications also were significant. In multivariate logistic regression, only
history of a fall was a significant predictor of future falling at 12 and 1
8 months; at 24 months, the presence of balance dysfunction symptoms was th
e significant predictor of those who fell.
Conclusions: The obstacle course, as a predictor of future falls, is not su
perior to the question of whether or not an individual has fallen in the pr
evious year, and is not recommended to predict future falls. The obstacle c
ourse may be better as a short-term indicator of response to a rehabilitati
on program for balance and mobility. (C) 1998 by the American Congress of R
ehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Re
habilitation.