Background: Using diagnostic information obtained at two different times, w
e incorporated error of measurement into structural equation twin models to
evaluate the contribution of additive genetic, common environmental, and i
ndividual-specific environmental factors to the liability to binge-eating a
nd broadly defined bulimia nervosa (BN). We also evaluated the validity of
the equal environment assumption (EEA) with reference to these two phenotyp
es.
Methods: We interviewed 1897 female twins (including both members of 854 tw
in pairs) from a population-based register about their lifetime history of
binge-eating and of broadly defined BN twice, approximately 5 years apart.
Results: The reliabilities of a lifetime history of binge-eating (kappa = .
34) and of broadly defined BN (kappa = .28) were low. Based on single inter
views, the heritability of binge-eating was estimated to be 50% and broad B
N 60%, with the remaining variance attributable to individual-specific envi
ronment. Common environmental influences had no effect on liability to eith
er trait. By combining information from two interview waves and thereby inc
orporating error of measurement into a structural equation model, the estim
ated heritability of the latent vulnerability to binge-eating (82%) and bro
adly defined BN (83%) increased substantially. Although there were no viola
tions of the EEA detected for binge-eating, cosocialization influenced twin
concordance for broadly defined BN.
Conclusions: Lifetime histories of binge-eating and broadly defined BN appe
ar to be highly heritable conditions of low reliability. Biol Psychiatry 19
98;44:1210-1218. (C) 1998 Society of Biological Psychiatry.