Developments in caries diagnosis and their relationship to treatment decisions and quality of care - ORCA Saturday Afternoon Symposium 1997

Citation
Eh. Verdonschot et al., Developments in caries diagnosis and their relationship to treatment decisions and quality of care - ORCA Saturday Afternoon Symposium 1997, CARIES RES, 33(1), 1999, pp. 32-40
Citations number
32
Categorie Soggetti
da verificare
Journal title
CARIES RESEARCH
ISSN journal
00086568 → ACNP
Volume
33
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
32 - 40
Database
ISI
SICI code
0008-6568(199901/02)33:1<32:DICDAT>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
This symposium report evaluates the achievements made in caries diagnostic research since the previous symposium held in 1992. The symposium aimed at presenting the state of the art of caries diagnostic methods, on presenting the links between caries diagnosis and subsequent treatment decisions and their effect on the treatment outcomes, particularly the quality of dental care. The variation among dentists in diagnosing (small) caries lesions and in treatment decision making is considerable. This has been explained by t he imperfection of caries decision making tests, but also by making incorre ct treatment decisions due to incorrect or partial understanding of diagnos tic test parameters. Meta-analyses into the performance of caries diagnosti c tests revealed that the available quantitative methods are very promising . It was concluded that these methods had high correlations with lesion dep th. They were considered suitable to monitor small changes in lesions. Many obstacsel have been experienced in attempting to transfer the outcomes of diagnostic research into clinical practice and it was concluded that caries diagnosis researchers should co-operate with manufacturers to introducing valid new diagnostic tools to the market. Main research priorities for the coming 10 years are to conduct cost-effectiveness and cost-utility studies of caries diagnostic tools, to continue to review the performances of diagn ostic tests, to transfer diagnostic knowledge and experience to the general practitioners particularly by constructing evidence-based clinical guide-l ines, to study the relationship between diagnosis and treatment decision, a nd to assess the effect of diagnostic and treatment decisions on the outcom e of care.