Long-term home treatment with epidural analgesia does not affect later spinal cord stimulation in patients with otherwise intractable angina pectoris

Objective: The only way some patients with intractable angina pectoris can endure the daily pain is by using opiates. Epidural morphine or spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for outpatients is a possibility for this patient group. The aim of this study was to determine whether patients previously treated with epidural injections had more frequent electrode migration, higher sti mulation needs, and less effect of SCS treatment. Design: A prospective, nonrandomized study with a 4-year follow-up period. Setting: Department of Anaesthesia, Pain Section. A referral center in inst itutional practice. Ambulatory care. Patients: The patient group comprised 53 patients; all had been treated dai ly with opiates. A total of 26 patients had epidural catheters for a mean t ime of 1 year before SCS. All patients had intractable angina pectoris. For these patients, further angioplasty or coronary bypass surgery was not tec hnically possible. Even with maximal medication, it was impossible to cope with the patients' angina pectoris, and the only way the patients could end ure the daily pain was by using opiates. Therefore, alternative therapies w ere considered to give these patients palliation. Intervention: SCS with epidural electrodes stimulating paresthesia in the a rea where angina is perceived. Main Outcome Measure: Difference for the patients previously treated with e pidural catheters in stimulation amplitude, frequency of electrode migratio n, and effect of SCS. Results: Stimulation demand (p = 0.09), frequency of electrode migrations ( p = 0.46), and pain-reducing effect (p = 0.16) were not different for the g roup of patients previously treated with epidural catheters for longer peri ods (1-36 months). Conclusions: SCS in patients previously treated with epidural catheters has an effect equal to that in other patients.