Crop diversification in the Sahel through use of environmental changes near Faidherbia albida (Del) A Chev

Citation
Wa. Payne et al., Crop diversification in the Sahel through use of environmental changes near Faidherbia albida (Del) A Chev, CROP SCI, 38(6), 1998, pp. 1585-1591
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture/Agronomy
Journal title
CROP SCIENCE
ISSN journal
0011183X → ACNP
Volume
38
Issue
6
Year of publication
1998
Pages
1585 - 1591
Database
ISI
SICI code
0011-183X(199811/12)38:6<1585:CDITST>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Pearl miller [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] is well adapted to the harsh environment of the West African Sahel but has relatively low genetic yield potential and market value. Crop diversification is desirable, but alternat ive crops generally cannot tolerate the harsh climate and soil conditions t hat pearl miller can. This study tested the hypothesis that alternative cro ps could be grown near Faidherbia albida (Del.) A. Chev. (syn. Acacia albid a), a tree species of semiarid Africa, because of its ameliorating effects on the surrounding environment. Octants around trees were sown to pearl mil let, maize (Zea mays L.), sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench], and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L). Crop, soil, and climate measurements were made per iodically during the growing season. Soil fertility and fine-particle conte nt decreased with distance from trees. Inside the canopy, irradiance was re duced by 0.5 to 1.0 kW m(-2) and daytime soil temperature at a depth of 0.0 5 m was reduced by as much as 6 degrees C. Improved conditions within the t ree canopy were reflected by increased crop yield. Sorghum and maize tended to use less soil water than millet. Sorghum and maize yielded more than 12 0 g m(-2) near the tree bole, whereas millet yielded approximate to 80 g m( -2). Near the edge of the tree canopy, where pearl millet maintained yields of 40 g m(-2), the other crops tended to fail. Faidherbia albida trees can be used to diversify cropping systems and increase yields in the Sahel, bu t adoption of this agroforestry system may be constrained by modern social factors which have disrupted traditional land husbandry practices.