The highest demand on insulin secretion occurs in connection with meals. In
normal people, following a meal, the insulin secretion increases rapidly,
reaching peak concentration in the blood within an hour. The mealtime insul
in response in patients with Type 2 diabetes is blunted and delayed, wherea
s basal levels often remain within the normal range (albeit at elevated fas
ting glucose levels). Restoration of the insulin secretion pattern at mealt
imes (prandial phase)-without stimulating insulin secretion in the 'postabs
orptive' phase-is the rationale for the development of 'prandial glucose re
gulators', drugs that are characterized by a very rapid onset and short dur
ation of action in stimulating insulin secretion. Repaglinide, a carbamoylm
ethyl benzoic acid (CMBA) derivative is the first such compound, which rece
ntly has become available for clinical use. Repaglinide is very rapidly abs
orbed (t(max) less than 1 hour) with a t(2) of less than one hour. Furtherm
ore, repaglinide is inactivated in the liver and more than 90% excreted via
the bile. The implications of tailoring repaglinide treatment to meals wer
e examined in a study where repaglinide was dosed either morning and evenin
g, or with each main meal (i.e. breakfast, lunch, dinner), with the total d
aily dose of repaglinide being identical. The mealtime dosing caused a sign
ificant improvement in both fasting and 24-hour glucose profiles, as well a
s a significant decrease in HbA(1c). In other studies, repaglinide caused a
decrease of 5.8 mmol.l(-1) in peak postprandial glucose levels, and a decr
ease of 3.1 mmol.l(-1) in fasting levels with a reduction in HbA(1c) of 1.8
% compared with placebo. In comparative studies with either sulphonylurea o
r metformin, repaglinide caused similar or improved control (i.e. HbA(1c),
mean glucose levels) and the drug was well tolerated (e.g. reported gastroi
ntestinal side-effects were more than halved when patients were switched fr
om metformin to repaglinide). A hallmark of repaglinide treatment is that t
his medication follows the eating pattern, and not vice verse. Hence the ri
sk of developing severe hypoglycaemia (BG less than or equal to 2.5 mmol.l(
-1)) in connection with flexible lifestyles should be reduced. This concept
was examined in a study in which patients well controlled on repaglinide s
kipped their lunch on one occasion. When a meal (i.e. lunch) was skipped-so
was the repaglinide dose, whereas in the comparative group on glibenclamid
e the recommended morning and evening doses were taken. Twenty-four per cen
t of the patients in the glibenclamide group developed severe hypoglycaemia
, whereas no hypoglycaemic events occurred in the group receiving repaglini
de. However, in long-term studies the overall prevalence of hypoglycaemia w
as similar to that found with other insulin secretagogues. In summary, curr
ent evidence shows that the concept of prandial glucose regulation offers g
ood long-term glycaemic control combined with a low risk of severe hypoglyc
aemia with missed meals. The concept should meet the needs of Type 2 diabet
ic patients, allowing flexibility in their lifestyle. (C) 1998 John Wiley &
Sons, Ltd.