An important trend in military doctrine for so-called 'peace support operat
ions' has been to place them on a spectrum that includes coercion and enfor
cement This paper focuses on British writers of doctrine as those responsib
le for driving the debate forward and forging a consensus among leading mil
itary powers. Their discourse is combat oriented, a fact reinforced by a tr
end towards strategic subcontracting to coalitions of the militarily willin
g and able. At the same time, there has been a move to institutionalise the
involvement of military forces in relief peace building and development ac
tivities. The overall emphasis is on stability and security to facilitate t
he delivery of humanitarian relief and to establish the conditions for peac
e-building processes. In the case of Bosnia, this involves conditionality a
nd economic leverage. Although there is a long-established record of peace-
keeping forces engaging in goodwill activities (with mixed results), the cu
rrent trends contain contradictions that seem likely to contribute to the w
idely perceived erosion of classical humanitarian principles.