In this paper the macro and structural implications of three alternative ta
riff-reduction strategies are examined. Under the first strategy, which is
similar to that adopted in Australia in 1973, the tariff cut is implemented
without warning. The second strategy is consistent with the current approa
ch of phasing in tariff cuts according to a previously announced schedule.
Under the third strategy the tariff cut is implemented several years after
it is announced. Our results suggest that if tariffs are to be reduced then
it is preferable to implement the policy without warning.