S. Johnson et L. Salvador-carulla, Description and classification of mental health services: a European perspective, EUR PSYCHIA, 13(7), 1998, pp. 333-341
Whilst steady progress has been made in the development and dissemination o
f valid and reliable instruments for evaluation of patient outcomes, progre
ss in establishing standard methodologies for description and classificatio
n of mental health services has been limited. Valid and reliable methods of
describing and classifying services are needed in mental health services r
esearch for purposes including; i) comparison of levels of provision betwee
n catchment areas and countries; ii) reaching an understanding of the relat
ionship between socio-demographic indicators and service use; iii) investig
ation of the degree to which one service may be substituted for another; iv
) evaluating programme implementation; and v) understanding why different o
utcomes are observed from apparently similar treatment programmes. Where pr
ogrammes of research encompass different countries, the need for methods of
comparing the local service contexts is particularly acute. In this paper,
the various contributions which have been made to the somewhat fragmented
body of research in this area are reviewed, and the problems which have ham
pered the development of satisfactory instruments are discussed. A set of c
riteria for satisfactory service measurement methodologies is proposed: the
se include development of standard nomenclature and operational definitions
of service types; clear demonstration of validity and reliability; compreh
ensiveness; and applicability and similar interpretation in a range of coun
tries. (C) 1998 Elsevier, Paris.