Concept description and thermalhydraulics of liquid surface FW/blankets for high power density reactors

Citation
A. Ying et al., Concept description and thermalhydraulics of liquid surface FW/blankets for high power density reactors, FUSION TECH, 34(3), 1998, pp. 855-862
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Nuclear Emgineering
Journal title
FUSION TECHNOLOGY
ISSN journal
07481896 → ACNP
Volume
34
Issue
3
Year of publication
1998
Part
2
Pages
855 - 862
Database
ISI
SICI code
0748-1896(199811)34:3<855:CDATOL>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
The attractive features and scientific challenges offered by the liquid wal l systems render them strong candidates for investigation in the APEX proje ct[1]. In particular, their high power density capabilities make the fusion reactors economically competitive. In this paper, as part of evolving a pr actical design based on this evolutionary idea, issues concerning thermalhy draulics of liquid surface first wall/blankets were analyzed. Design approa ches as presently envisioned include both liquid films over the solid surfa ce and gravity driven thick liquid jets using lithium and flibe as working fluids. The analyses involved defining liquid systems operating conditions, such as velocity and inlet/outlet temperatures, as well as to calculate fr ee surface temperature so that the evaporation rate from the free surface w ould not jeopardize plasma operation while maintaining the liquid temperatu re within the operating windows for high thermal efficiencies. All analyses were performed for a neutron wall load of 10 MW/m(2) and its corresponding surface heat flux of 2 MW/m(2) The results indicated that high velocities, hard x-ray spectra and turbulent heat transfer enhancement were necessary conditions for keeping flibe first wall temperature low. On the other hand, at velocities of 20 m/s or higher, it appears possible to maintain lithium film evaporation rate below 10(20)#/m(2)s in an ARIES-RS type configuratio n. Nevertheless, present analyses have not uncovered any basic flaws or maj or shortcomings in the underlying scientific or technical arguments for the concepts. Yet, engineering innovations of how to maintain and control the flow and the associated analyses are still needed.