Gs. Paterakis et al., Cross evaluation of three flow cytometric F cell counting methods performed by different laboratories, HEMOGLOBIN, 22(5-6), 1998, pp. 427-444
Three flow cytometric methods of counting F cells were evaluated in the set
tings of an external laboratory assessment scheme. The laboratories to part
icipate with a different method were located in Oxford (method O), Athens (
method A) and Jerusalem, (method J). Two monoclonal anti-gamma chain antibo
dies were used: monoclonal antibody produced by P. Beverley (Oxford) (BEV)
and an antibody provided by Bioatlantic S.A.R.L. (France) (BIO). The specim
ens tested were mixtures in five predefined ratios of a sample with homozyg
ous GP-thalassemia with 100% F cells with a sample with no P cells. A centr
al independent laboratory prepared and distributed the aliquots (at room te
mperature) to the participating centers within 2 (O), 3 (A), and 6 (J) days
. The performance of the three methods was evaluated by: 1) deviation indic
es, 2) relative accuracy, as percent difference of the counts from the targ
et values, and 3) bias and linearity by linear regression of the counts ver
sus the target values [parameters: slope(s), y-intercept (y), R squared (Rs
), and F ratio]. The highest score of performance was obtained by method A
with both monoclonal antibodies.