The past twenty-five years have seen dramatic changes in the transition to
retirement. This article considers an overlooked set of social processes-in
formal age structuring-within the context of these changes. Data are drawn
from a random sample of 319 adults from the Chicago area. For about half of
the respondents, age was considered an irrelevant dimension for both men's
and women's retirement. Those respondents who found age relevant cited dea
dlines that were clustered not only around the critical points at which res
earchers have observed regularity in retirement patterns, but they also inc
luded the lower junctures that are emerging as part of the shift toward ear
lier retirement. These deadlines most often marked the place of retirement
relative to a larger set of work transitions, or they budgeted enough lime
to pursue developmental opportunities at the end of life. However, most res
pondents said there were no serious consequences for retiring late. Importa
nt patterns also emerged across the background characteristics of our respo
ndents. These findings feed into several provocative debates that relate ti
me and age to models of life-course flexibility or rigidity.