Lichen planus or lichenoid tattoo reaction?

Citation
M. Dang et al., Lichen planus or lichenoid tattoo reaction?, INT J DERM, 37(11), 1998, pp. 860-861
Citations number
7
Categorie Soggetti
Dermatology
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY
ISSN journal
00119059 → ACNP
Volume
37
Issue
11
Year of publication
1998
Pages
860 - 861
Database
ISI
SICI code
0011-9059(199811)37:11<860:LPOLTR>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
A 27-year-old white man with a tattoo of 3 months' duration was referred fo r possible laser removal because a pruritic eruption had developed in the t attoo 1 month after placement. Physical examination revealed erythematous p apules confined to the red areas of the tattoo (Fig. 1). He also had flat-t opped papules on the glans penis, which the patient stated had developed a few weeks after tattoo placement. Biopsy of a penile lesion revealed a histologic pattern characteristic of l ichen planus. Biopsy of the tattoo eruption revealed a lichenoid lymphocyti c infiltrate with hyperkeratosis, hypergranulosis, and jagged epidermal hyp erplasia. Deposits of black granular material were also present in the uppe r part of the dermis (Fig. 2). During a 2-week follow-up visit, the patient developed more lesions on his arms and legs. After 4 weeks of treatment with halobetasol propionate ointm ent 0.05% to the tattoo, legs, and arms, all lesions had resolved. The red areas of the tattoo became flat, nonpalpable, and asymptomatic (Fig. 3).