Objective: To study the clinical efficacy, safety and acceptability of the
thermal balloon endometrial ablation (TBEA) in patients with dysfunctional
uterine bleeding. Methods: Thirteen patients with DUE who did not respond t
o medical treatment and dilatation and curettage consented to a trial of TB
EA with EASY(TM) model of balloon catheter by Gynecare. All procedures were
done under intravenous (IV) sedation and paracervical block. Patients were
mostly discharged within 48 h. Follow-up of 2-19 months is reported. Trans
vaginal ultrasound and hysteroscopy were performed in six patients after 6
months of TBEA. Results: Twelve patients (92.5%)reported a significant redu
ction in bleeding. Two patients (15.4%) experienced amenorrhea. Only two pa
tients (15.4%) underwent subsequent hysterectomy, one for persistent menorr
hagia and the other for severe pelvic pain. In successful patients of TBEA,
transvaginal ultrasonography revealed marked reduction in endometrial thic
kness and no endometrium was visible in one patient who had developed ameno
rrhea. In successful cases follow-up hysteroscopy revealed scarring in more
than two-thirds of the endometrium. Conclusions: Thermal balloon endometri
al ablation is a safe, simple, effective, easy and minimally invasive proce
dure which can be done under IV sedation and paracervical block in an offic
e setting. It has several advantages over hysterectomy, including preservat
ion of the uterus, avoidance of surgical incision and potential to perform
on an outpatient basis. It is a good alternative to hysteroscopic endometri
al ablation with a comparable success rate with minimal risk and no limitin
g factors except the cost of the balloons. However, large scale randomized
controlled studies are needed with TBEA and other endometrial ablation proc
edures. (C) 1998 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.