AN AUTOMATED AND INTERACTIVE APPROACH FOR HEAT-EXCHANGER NETWORK RETROFIT

Authors
Citation
Ndk. Asante et Xx. Zhu, AN AUTOMATED AND INTERACTIVE APPROACH FOR HEAT-EXCHANGER NETWORK RETROFIT, Chemical engineering research & design, 75(A3), 1997, pp. 349-360
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Engineering, Chemical
ISSN journal
02638762
Volume
75
Issue
A3
Year of publication
1997
Pages
349 - 360
Database
ISI
SICI code
0263-8762(1997)75:A3<349:AAAIAF>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
This paper combines mathematical optimization techniques with a better understanding of the retrofit problem, based on thermodynamic analysi s and practical engineering, to produce a systematic procedure capable of efficiently solving industrial size retrofit problems. The major c haracteristic of the approach presented is that it offers a systematic and automatic method for the retrofit design of heat exchanger networ ks (HENs), combined with a facility for meaningful user interaction. T he new procedure employs a two-stage approach for retrofit HEN design: The first stage is the diagnosis stage, during which a minimum number of promising HEN topology modifications is obtained which enables a d esired heat recovery target to be achieved. In the second stage, the o ptimization stage, the HEN obtained after implementation of the modifi cations is optimized using non-linear optimization techniques to minim ize the cost of additional surface area employed. It has been observed that heat recovery in a HEN is thermodynamically limited by certain e xchanger matches unavoidably tending to a zero degree temperature appr oach as the heat recovery increases. These exchanger matches, which ar e termed as pinching matches, act as a bottleneck to heat recovery in the HEN. To increase the potential for heat recovery beyond the limits caused by the pinching matches, the network topology must be altered by repiping of exchangers, addition of new exchanger matches or creati on of stream splits. Based on the above observation, the diagnosis sta ge is made up of two steps. In the first step the HEN bottleneck is id entified, and in the second step a mixed integer Linear programming (M ILP) formulation is used to select a single modification which will be st overcome the identified bottleneck. These two steps are repeated in a loop to yield the required set of promising topology modifications.