Objective: This study evaluated various substances that could be used to ca
librate the Thrombelastograph.
Design: Prospective, controlled comparison.
Setting: Operating room laboratory at a tertiary care university hospital.
Participants: None.
Interventions: Six substances commonly available in the operating room sett
ing (ointments, cream, and gels) were analyzed by thromboelastography for 3
minutes. Sixty measurements were made for each substance.
Measurements and Main Results: Thromboelastographic analysis of the ointmen
ts and cream preparations had an amplitude variability that exceeded 10 mm
within the 3-minute recording period. The conductive gel had the most repro
ducible thromboelastography tracing with a mean amplitude of 62.5 +/- 1.1 m
m (analysis of variance, p < 0.0005). There was a significant correlation b
etween the reported viscosity of the three gels and the deflection amplitud
e (linear regression, R-2 = 0.97;p < 0.0001).
Conclusion: Conductive gel is a useful substance for quickly checking the f
unctional status of the Thrombelastograph at an operational stage. Ca libra
tion of the Thrombelastograph using a gel of known viscosity is clinically
relevant and may be more practical than testing with thromboelastographic-d
efined normal and abnormal blood analogs. Copyright (C) 1998 by W.B. Saunde
rs Company.