Criterion validity and the utility of reactive and proactive aggression: Comparisons to attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, conduct disorder, and other measures of functioning
Da. Waschbusch et al., Criterion validity and the utility of reactive and proactive aggression: Comparisons to attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, conduct disorder, and other measures of functioning, J CLIN CHIL, 27(4), 1998, pp. 396-405
Examined the criterion validity and the utility of Dodge and Cole's (1987)
measure of reactive and proactive aggression. Participants were 405 childre
n in kindergarten through 5th grade attending an urban elementary school. E
xamined criterion validity by testing whether reactive aggression or proact
ive aggression was significantly correlated with criterion measures of over
all impairment as measured by the Impairment Rating Scale (Pelham, Gnagy, e
t at, 1996), classroom behavior as measured by a frequency count of classro
om rule violations, and peer adjustment as measured by teacher ratings of p
eer behavior on the Pittsburgh Modified IOWA Conners (Pelham, Milich, Murph
y, & Murphy, 1989). Examined utility by testing whether reactive aggression
or proactive aggression was significantly correlated with criterion measur
es after controlling for each other and after controlling for attention def
icit hyperactivity disorder oppositional defiant disorder, and conduct diso
rder as measured by the Disruptive Behavior Disorder Rating Scales (Pelham,
Gnagy, Greenslade, & Milich, 1992). Results showed good evidence of criter
ion validity for both reactive and proactive aggression, but mixed evidence
for their utility.