Mh. White et al., AMPHOTERICIN-B COLLOIDAL DISPERSION VS AMPHOTERICIN-B AS THERAPY FOR INVASIVE ASPERGILLOSIS, Clinical infectious diseases, 24(4), 1997, pp. 635-642
To assess the efficacy and safety of amphotericin B colloidal dispersi
on (ABCD), 82 patients with proven or probable aspergillosis who were
treated in clinical trials with ABCD were compared retrospectively wit
h 261 patients with aspergillosis who were treated with amphotericin B
at six cancer or transplant centers from January 1990 to June 1994. T
he groups were balanced in terms of underlying disease; ABCD recipient
s were younger and more likely to have preexisting renal insufficiency
than were amphotericin B recipients (40.7% vs. 8.7%, respectively), a
nd amphotericin B recipients were more likely to be neutropenic at bas
eline than were ABCD recipients (42.5% vs, 15.9%, respectively), Respo
nse rates (48.8%) and survival rates (50%) among ABCD-treated patients
were higher than those (23.4% and 28.4%, respectively) among amphoter
icin B-treated patients (P < .001 for both comparisons), Renal dysfunc
tion developed less frequently in ABCD recipients than in amphotericin
B recipients (8.2% vs. 43.1%, respectively; P < .001), Multivariate a
nalysis revealed that treatment group was the best predictor of respon
se, mortality, and nephrotoxicity (ABCD: relative risk [RR] = 3.00, P
= .002; RR = 0.35, P < .001; and RR = 0.13, P = .001; respectively). T
his retrospective study suggests that in the treatment of aspergillosi
s ABCD causes fewer nephrotoxic effects than amphotericin B and the ef
ficacy of ABCD is at least comparable with that of amphotericin B.