Considerable controversy and debate surrounds the practice of slotting allo
wances, or fees, paid by manufacturers for obtaining the patronage of retai
lers. To date, regulators have yet to agree on public policy toward these p
ractices; at least one federal antitrust agency suggests that slotting fees
may be competitive, another has conducted investigations ir these practice
s, and still another suggests banning them altogether. In this article, the
authors examine the recent decision by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and
Firearms (BATF) to prohibit slotting allowances in the retail sale of alco
hol beverages. Focusing on the regulatory environment, industry structure,
marketing practices, and consumer consumption behavior in the alcohol bever
age industry, the authors analyze the BATF's decision and attempt to reconc
ile disparate public policy treatment of these practices. Implications for
understanding slotting allowances and recommendations for further public po
licy development and research then are explored.