Ip. Jensen et Bf. Vestergaard, ASSESSMENT OF THE SPECIFICITY OF A COMMERCIAL HUMAN PARVOVIRUS B19 IGM ASSAY, Clinical and diagnostic virology, 7(3), 1997, pp. 133-137
Background: It is important to investigate a possible cross-reaction o
f anti-rubella IgM in the IDEIA(TM) Parvovirus B19 IgM test because ma
ny B19 infections are either asymptomatic or have clinical symptoms si
milar to those of rubella virus infections. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) I
gM, cytomegalovirus (CMV) IgM, measles IgM and rheumatoid factor (RF)
IgM cross-reactions were also studied. Objectives: In the period from
February to September 1994 (including a parvovirus B19 epidemic) more
than 10 000 serum samples were examined for parvovirus B19 IgM in Denm
ark. This gave an opportunity to evaluate the commercial IDEIA(TM) Par
vovirus B19 ELISA kit (DAKO A/S, Glostrup, Denmark), which was used ro
utinely at Statens Serum Institut from the beginning of 1994 and onwar
ds. Study design: A total of 123 parvovirus B19 IgM positive sera were
tested for reactivity in rubella IgM EIA. A total of 78 rubella IgM p
ositive sera, 60 EBV VCA-IgM positive sera, 30 CMV IgM positive sera a
nd 24 measles virus IgM positive sera were tested for reaction in IDEI
A(TM) Parvovirus B19 IgM test. Finally, 25 parvovirus IgM positive ser
a were tested for specific IgM against measles virus, EBV (VCA), CMV a
nd for RF. Results: One anti-B19 IgM positive serum sample reacted pos
itively in the rubella IgM test. Of rubella IgM positive serum samples
4% cross-reacted in IDEIA(TM) Parvovirus B19 IgM test, as did 17 and
20% of EBV VCA-IgM and CMV IgM positive serum samples respectively. No
ne of measles virus IgM positive serum samples cross-reacted in the ID
EIA(TM) Parvovirus B19 IgM test. Of 25 initially parvovirus B19 IgM po
sitive sera 20% cross-reacted in EBV VCA IgM test and 8% in the CMV Ig
M test. None reacted positively in measles virus IgM test; 28% showed
weak reactivity in RF IgM test. Conclusions: Precautions must be taken
when results of IgM assays are interpreted. Epidemiological and clini
cal observations must be considered. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science B.V.