Variation of anatomic valve area during ejection in patients with valvularaortic stenosis evaluated by two-dimensional echocardiographic planimetry:Comparison with traditional Doppler data
M. Arsenault et al., Variation of anatomic valve area during ejection in patients with valvularaortic stenosis evaluated by two-dimensional echocardiographic planimetry:Comparison with traditional Doppler data, J AM COL C, 32(7), 1998, pp. 1931-1937
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Objectives. Flow variations can affect valve-area calculation in aortic ste
nosis and lead to inaccuracies in the evaluation of the stenosis. Knowing t
hat transvalvular how varies normally within one beat, we designed this stu
dy to assess the response of the valve to intrabeat variation of flow durin
g systole.
Results were compared with flow derived measurements. Background. Technolog
ical improvements now allow us to evaluate aortic valve area directly by sh
ort axis planimetry, This offers the possibility to perform serial planimet
ries during one ejection phase and analyze the intrabeat dynamic behavior o
f the stenotic-aortic valve and compare these measurements with flow-derive
d measurements.
Methods. Forty echocardiograms displaying different degrees of aortic steno
sis were analyzed by frame-by frame planimetry of the valve area from onset
of opening to complete closure. Maximal-mean area, opening and closing rat
es and ejection times were obtained and compared with Doppler-derived data.
Results. Valve area varied during ejection. Stenotic valves opened and clos
ed more slowly than normals and remained maximally open for a shorter perio
d. Mean area by Doppler data corresponded more closely to maximal than to m
ean-planimetered area. Duration of flow was shorter than valve opening in s
everely stenotic valves, Discrepancies between Doppler-derived and two-dime
nsional (2D) measurements decreased in less stenotic valves.
Conclusions. Our observations reveal striking differences between the dynam
ics of normal and stenotic valves. Surprisingly, Doppler-derived mean-valve
area correlated better with maximal-anatomic area than with mean-anatomic
area in patients with aortic stenosis. Discrepancies between duration of fl
ow and valve opening could explain this phenomenon. (J Am Coll Cardiol 1998
;32:1931-7) (C) 1998 by the American College of Cardiology.