Various theoretical accounts of power in social exchange networks have
emerged in recent years. We use a new experimental setting to test as
sumptions that appear to be implicit in all network exchange theories
of power: Actors in exchange networks increase their demands following
social exchange and concede more resources when excluded. We also tes
ted for the relative impact of inclusion versus exclusion and differen
tial responses to multiple exchange partners given exchange with just
one of them. We observed that the tendency to concede following exclus
ion was significantly greater than the tendency to raise demands follo
wing an exchange. Furthermore, when an actor had multiple potential ex
change partners, the clear tendency was to demand more from those with
whom exchange just occurred, but not from those excluded. These findi
ngs are discussed in view of current theories of exchange and commitme
nt.