Three-dimensional echocardiographic determination of left ventricular volumes and function by multiplane transesophageal transducer: Dynamic in vitrovalidation and in vivo comparison with angiography and thermodilution
Hp. Kuhl et al., Three-dimensional echocardiographic determination of left ventricular volumes and function by multiplane transesophageal transducer: Dynamic in vitrovalidation and in vivo comparison with angiography and thermodilution, J AM S ECHO, 11(12), 1998, pp. 1113-1124
Citations number
41
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY
The goal of this study was to validate 3-dimensional echocardiography by mu
ltiplane transesophageal transducer for the determination of left ventricul
ar volumes and ejection fraction in an in vitro experiment and to compare t
he method in vivo with biplane angiography and the continuous thermodilutio
n method. In the dynamic in vitro experiment, we scanned rubber balloons in
a water tank by using a pulsatile now model. Twenty-nine measurements of v
olumes and ejection fractions were performed at increasing heart rates. Thr
ee-dimensional echocardiography showed a very high accuracy for volume meas
urements and ejection fraction calculation (correlation coefficient, standa
rd error of estimate, and mean difference for end-diastolic volume 0.998, 2
.3 mL, and 0.1 mL; for end-systolic volume 0.996, 2.7 mL, and 0.5 mL; and f
or ejection fraction 0.995, 1.0%, and -0.4%, respectively). However, with i
ncreasing heart rate there was progressive underestimation of ejection frac
tion calculation (percent error for heart rate below and above 100 bpm 0.59
% and -8.6%, P < .001). In the in vivo study, left ventricular volumes and
ejection fraction of 24 patients with symmetric and distorted left ventricu
lar shape were compared with angiography results. There was good agreement
for the subgroup of patients with normal left ventricular shape (mean diffe
rence +/- 95% confidence interval for end-diastolic volume 5.2 +/- 6.7 mL,
P < .05; for end-systolic volume -0.5 +/- 8.4 mL, P = not significant; for
ejection fraction 2.4% +/- 7.2%, P = not significant) and significantly mor
e variability in the patients with left ventricular aneurysms (end-diastoli
c volume 25.1 +/- 56.4 mL, P < .01; end-systolic volume 5.6 +/- 41.0 mL, P
= not significant; ejection fraction 4.9% +/- 16.0%, P < .05). Additionally
, in 20 critically ill, ventilated patients, stroke volume and cardiac outp
ut measurements were compared with measurement from continuous thermodiluti
on. Stroke volume as well as cardiac output correlated well to thermodiluti
on (r = 0.89 and 0.84, respectively, P < .001), although both parameters we
re significantly underestimated by S-dimensional echocardiography (mean dif
ference +/- 95% confidence interval = -6.4 +/- 16.0 mL and -0.6 +/- 1.6 L/m
in, respectively, P < .005).