Electron beam and scanning probe lithography: A comparison

Citation
K. Wilder et al., Electron beam and scanning probe lithography: A comparison, J VAC SCI B, 16(6), 1998, pp. 3864-3873
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Apllied Physucs/Condensed Matter/Materiales Science","Material Science & Engineering
Journal title
JOURNAL OF VACUUM SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY B
ISSN journal
10711023 → ACNP
Volume
16
Issue
6
Year of publication
1998
Pages
3864 - 3873
Database
ISI
SICI code
1071-1023(199811/12)16:6<3864:EBASPL>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
sElectron beam lithography (EBL) and scanning probe lithography (SPL) are e lectron exposure techniques capable of high resolution patterning of organi c resists. This article compares the exposure properties of these two syste ms. We consider the resist sensitivity to EEL and SPL electrons, exposure t olerances, patterning linearity, and proximity effects. It is possible to p rint sub-50 nm features using both systems, but SPL has a wider exposure la titude at these small feature sizes. SPL requires a significantly higher in cident electron dose for exposure than does EEL. In EEL, lithography contro l is most limited by proximity effects which arise from backscattered elect rons whose range is considerably larger than the forward scattering range i n the resist film. As a result, the exposed feature dimension depends stron gly on the local feature density and size, leading to unacceptable linewidt h variations across a wafer. These limitations are alleviated in the case o f SPL exposures. We demonstrate improved linearity and reduced proximity ef fects with SPL. We have patterned 200 nm pitch grids with SPL where all ind ividual features are resolved. The Linewidth of features in these grids is the same as the width of an isolated line at the same dose. Finally, we sug gest that the SPL exposure mechanism may be different than that for EEL. (C ) 1998 American Vacuum Society. [S0734-211X(98)15306-4].