PERIPHERAL-BLOOD PICTURE IN PRIMARY HYPOCELLULAR REFRACTORY-ANEMIA AND IDIOPATHIC ACQUIRED APLASTIC-ANEMIA - AN ADDITIONAL TOOL FOR DIFFERENTIAL-DIAGNOSIS
Mt. Elghetany et al., PERIPHERAL-BLOOD PICTURE IN PRIMARY HYPOCELLULAR REFRACTORY-ANEMIA AND IDIOPATHIC ACQUIRED APLASTIC-ANEMIA - AN ADDITIONAL TOOL FOR DIFFERENTIAL-DIAGNOSIS, Haematologica, 82(1), 1997, pp. 21-24
Background and Objective. Hypoplastic myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS)
are being reported with increasing frequency. Aplastic anemia (AA) nee
ds to be differentiated from hypoplastic MDS particularly primary hypo
plastic refractory anemia (PHRA) because of the impact on management a
nd prognosis. This distinction may be morphologically difficult even w
ith careful marrow examination which may provide insufficient material
due to extreme hypocellularity. The value of peripheral blood (PB) pa
rameters ill making the distinction between AA and PHRA is not well st
udied. In this work, we attempt to examine peripheral blood findings a
s an additional tool for differentiating PHRA from acquired idiopathic
AA. Methods. PB findings in ten cases of PHRA, which are selected bas
ed on the following: less than 30% cellularity, multilineage dysplasia
and/or clonal cytogenetic abnormality, are compared to ten cases of c
lassic AA. The PB is examined for automated parameters, differential w
hite cell count, morphologic changes in red cells, white cells, platel
ets, and the presence of circulating blasts, megakaryocytic fragments
and micromegakaryocytes. Results. AA patients tend to have lower plate
let and monocytic counts and higher lymphocytic percentages. The follo
wing morphologic findings are seen only in PHRA but not in AA: hypochr
omic red cells, left shift, circulating blasts, hypersegmentation with
long filaments, hypogranular, ring, and pelgeroid neutrophils, Dohle
bodies, circulating micromegakaryocytes and megakaryocytic fragments.
Interpretation and Conclusions. We conclude that careful examination o
f peripheral blood may provide sufficient information to allow for the
distinction between PHRA and AA early in the course of the disease. S
imilarly, patients with classic AA who subsequently develop unusual bl
ood findings during routine follow up should be suspected of having a
clonal evolution which needs to be confirmed by marrow examination and
cytogenetic analysis. (C) 1997, Ferrata Storti Foundation.