Rp. Takes et al., MARKERS FOR ASSESSMENT OF NODAL METASTASIS IN LARYNGEAL CARCINOMA, Archives of otolaryngology, head & neck surgery, 123(4), 1997, pp. 412-419
Background: Regional metastasis is an important factor in the treatmen
t and prognosis of patients with head and neck squamous tell carcinoma
. Although in recent years imaging techniques have improved, it is sti
ll impossible to detect small metastatic deposits. Metastasis is mainl
y determined by properties of the primary tumor and its interaction wi
th surrounding structures. Objective: To identify markers that predict
the presence of metastasis based on the features of the primary tumor
. Design: Correlation of the results of histological, immunohistochemi
cal, and molecular biological analysis with clinical and histopatholog
ical data. Materials and Methods: Several histological features and bi
ological markers were examined in 31 laryngeal carcinomas. The followi
ng markers were selected on their putative role in the process of meta
stasis and were studied using immunohistochemical and/or Southern blot
techniques: proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), p53, retinobla
stoma tumor-suppressor gene (Rb), myc, bcl-2 (inhibitor of apoptosis).
epidermal growth factor (EGF), EGF-receptor (EGFR), neu, nm23 (also k
nown as NME1, putative metastasis suppressor), desmoplakin, neuron cel
l-adhesion molecule (N-CAM), epithelial cell-adhesion molecule (Ep-CAM
), E-cadherin, cyclin D1 (CCND1), and EMS1. Results: The presence of a
n inflammatory reaction surrounding the tumor (P = .07), eosinophilic
infiltration (P = .16), positive immunostaining for Rb (P = .02), nega
tive immunostaining for Ep-CAM (P = .13), and amplification of CCND1 a
nd EMS1 (P = .05) correlated with nodal metastasis. The combination of
an inflammatory reaction, eosinophilic infiltration, and staining for
Rb and Ep-CAM resulted in a superior accuracy in assessing nodal meta
stasis. Conclusions: These results indicate that it is possible to pre
dict and exclude lymph node metastasis by studying the features of the
primary tumor only. When these results are confirmed in a larger seri
es, biological markers may be powerful diagnostic tools with great imp
act on clinical decision making.