Objective. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there are age
d-based variations in the association between clinically detected and radio
graphically detected caries and whether the prevalence of clinically undete
cted radiographic caries varies across adult age groups.
Study design. The data for the analysis were from a clinical study that eva
luated the efficacy of guidelines for prescribing dental radiographs. A tot
al of 460 subjects had clinical examinations and interpretations made on fu
ll-mouth radiographs. Analysis was conducted to determine the tooth-specifi
c and subject-specific prevalences of clinically undetected caries and to e
stablish whether the association between clinical signs and radiographic si
gns varied by subject age.
Results. In total, approximately 5.8% of clinically sound teeth showed radi
ographic evidence of dentinal caries, and the prevalence increased with pat
ient age. The prevalence of clinical signs of medium and large caries was 7
.8% in 12,358 teeth in which caries was both clinically and radiographicall
y present However, for more than 80% of the teeth with clinically undetecte
d caries, the lesions were evident on the interproximal radiographs. The as
sociations between clinical and radiographic signs of dentinal caries were
homogeneous across age groups.
Conclusion. The findings demonstrate that adolescents and adults continue t
o have medium and large caries, although the location of the caries differs
by age group, with higher proportions of gingival caries in older patients
.