This research examined the process through which justice evaluations are fo
rmed. Using image theory's screening process we hypothesized that a rejecti
on threshold exists with regard to violations of just treatment (e.g., layi
ng off an employee without notice). If the number of violations exceeds the
decision-maker's threshold, a negative justice evaluation results. Nonviol
ations (e.g., providing laid-off employees with a generous severance packag
e) were hypothesized to only influence justice evaluations when violations
do not exceed the threshold. Three studies compared the impact of justice v
iolations and nonviolations on fairness evaluations. We also examined diffe
rences in fairness evaluations operationalized as judgments vs decisions. R
esults indicated that when making judgments about fairness, both violations
and nonviolations are equally important. However, when one has to decide o
n a course of action based on considerations of fairness, nonviolations are
only considered if fewer than three violations have been encountered. Thes
e results identify important distinctions between judgment and decisions an
d have implication for research examining outcomes of justice evaluations.
(C) 1998 Academic Press.