A rejection threshold in justice evaluations: Effects on judgment and decision-making

Citation
Sw. Gilliland et al., A rejection threshold in justice evaluations: Effects on judgment and decision-making, ORGAN BEHAV, 76(2), 1998, pp. 113-131
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Management
Journal title
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES
ISSN journal
07495978 → ACNP
Volume
76
Issue
2
Year of publication
1998
Pages
113 - 131
Database
ISI
SICI code
0749-5978(199811)76:2<113:ARTIJE>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
This research examined the process through which justice evaluations are fo rmed. Using image theory's screening process we hypothesized that a rejecti on threshold exists with regard to violations of just treatment (e.g., layi ng off an employee without notice). If the number of violations exceeds the decision-maker's threshold, a negative justice evaluation results. Nonviol ations (e.g., providing laid-off employees with a generous severance packag e) were hypothesized to only influence justice evaluations when violations do not exceed the threshold. Three studies compared the impact of justice v iolations and nonviolations on fairness evaluations. We also examined diffe rences in fairness evaluations operationalized as judgments vs decisions. R esults indicated that when making judgments about fairness, both violations and nonviolations are equally important. However, when one has to decide o n a course of action based on considerations of fairness, nonviolations are only considered if fewer than three violations have been encountered. Thes e results identify important distinctions between judgment and decisions an d have implication for research examining outcomes of justice evaluations. (C) 1998 Academic Press.