R. Stern et al., The Palomo procedure in the treatment of boys with varicocele: a retrospective study of testicular growth and fertility, PEDIAT SURG, 14(1-2), 1998, pp. 74-78
The Palomo procedure has often been criticized with regard to possible atro
phy of the testis. Measuring the testicular volume is mainly used in pre- a
nd postoperative assessment. Evidence concerning fertility remains unclear.
The aim of this study was to learn whether now-adult former patients had a
ny disturbance of their testicular growth and/or fertility. Out of 79 patie
nts operated upon with Palomo's procedure between 1979 and 1990, 33 could b
e evaluated. They all had grade If or III left-sided varicoceles. Investiga
tions consisted of: the patient's history, testicular-volume measurement by
means of an orchidometer (OM) (Prader) and ultrasonography (US), and semen
analysis (27/33) 6-17 years after surgery. No recurrence of grade II varic
oceles was observed. Only 1 of the 33 patients might have had testicular at
rophy, yet he had already fathered 3 children! Twenty-three had a normal sp
erm count and 24/27 showed normal sperm motility. Eight hydroceles were eit
her present at the time of investigation or had been operated upon in the p
ast. Estimations of testicular volume by OM and US showed significant diffe
rences between the two methods concerning volume and relation of right to l
eft side. In general, the volume was overestimated by the OM. The study sho
ws that in boys the simple surgical technique proposed by Palomo has - in t
he long run - no disadvantages for testicular development and sperm product
ion. Fertility should therefore not be compromised.