This analysis compares the results of an open-ended study on the effects of
informal caregiving with data obtained from a separate investigation that
used the same sample but employed fixed-item measures of burden. Informal c
aregivers (N = 229) were interviewed with both approaches six weeks after t
he patients (care receivers) were discharged from the hospital. Percentages
, t tests, and analyses of variance were used to compare and contrast the d
ata. The analysis found substantial correspondence between the results from
the two approaches, especially around the negative effects of caregiving.
Less correspondence was found on the positive effects of caregiving, partic
ularly with regard to subjective fixed items.