The system of wage setting in the Nordic countries is often regarded as hig
hly centralised, contributing to considerable real wage flexibility. This v
iew has been questioned, as sizeable wage drift may offset the effect of ce
ntral negotiations. This paper presents evidence from the four major Nordic
countries, suggesting that there is little or no such offsetting effect. Y
et, at central negotiations, the institutional system of wage formation may
induce nominal rigidities that may prevent wage restraint when there is li
ttle room for money wage growth. Empirical evidence supports the existence
of nominal rigidity.