M. Von Korff et al., A randomized trial of a lay person-led self-management group intervention for back pain patients in primary care, SPINE, 23(23), 1998, pp. 2608-2615
Study Design. Randomized, controlled trial.
Objective. To evaluate a four-session. serf-management group intervention f
or patients with pain in primary care, led by trained lay persons with back
pain, The intervention was designed to reduce patient worries, encourage s
elf-care, and reduce activity limitations.
Background Data. Randomized trials of educational interventions suggest tha
t activating interventions may improve back pain outcomes, Expert opinion i
ncreasingly regards effective self-management of back pain as important in
achieving good outcomes, in this study, an educational intervention designe
d to activate patients and support effective self-management was evaluated.
Methods. Six to 8 Weeks after a primary care visit for back pain, patients
were invited to participate in an educational program to improve back pain
self-management. Those showing interest by returning a brief questionnaire
became eligible for the study. Participants ( n = 255) randomly were assign
ed to either a self-management group intervention or to a usual care contro
l group. The effect of the intervention, relative to usual care, was assess
ed 3, 6, and 12 months after randomization, controlling for baseline values
. The intervention consisted of a four-session group applying problem-solvi
ng techniques to back pain self-management, supplemented by educational mat
erials (book and videos), supporting active management of back pain. The gr
oups were led by lay persons trained to implement a fully structured group
protocol. the control group received usual care, supplemented by a book on
back pain care.
Results. Participants randomly assigned to the self-management groups repor
ted significantly less worry about back pain and expressed more confidence
in self-care. Roland Disability Questionnaire Scores were significantly low
er among participants in the self-management groups relative to the usual c
are controls at 6 months (P = 0.007), and this difference was sustained at
12 months at borderline significance levels. (P = 0.09). Among self-managem
ent group participants, 48% showed a 50% or greater reduction in Roland Dis
ability Questionnaire Score at 6 months, compared with 33% among the usual
care controls.
Conclusions. Self-management groups led by trained lay persons following a
structured protocol were more effective than usual care in reducing worries
, producing positive attitudes toward self-care, and reducing activity limi
tations among patients with back pain in primary care.