Evaluation of pre-Northridge steel moment-resisting frame joints

Citation
A. Whittaker et al., Evaluation of pre-Northridge steel moment-resisting frame joints, STRUC DES T, 7(4), 1998, pp. 263-283
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Civil Engineering
Journal title
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF TALL BUILDINGS
ISSN journal
10628002 → ACNP
Volume
7
Issue
4
Year of publication
1998
Pages
263 - 283
Database
ISI
SICI code
1062-8002(199812)7:4<263:EOPSMF>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
The 1994 Northridge earthquake caused widespread and unexpected damage to s teel moment-resisting joints and connections. Shortly following the earthqu ake, the Federal Emergency Management Agency funded a series of full-scale tests of steel moment-resisting joints and connections to characterize the behavior of pre-earthquake connections and to evaluate the efficacy of st s elected number of repair schemes. Twelve pre-earthquake connections were te sted. Three of the twelve connections were tested by the authors to failure , and then repaired and re-tested. The response of the pre-earthquake conne ctions was highly variable and uniformly poor. Premature fractures were obs erved in all twelve connections, and the types of fractures were similar to those observed in the field following the earthquake. The mean beam plasti c rotation was 0.005 rad: one-sixth of the target value of 0.03 rad. The re sponse of those moment-resisting connections that were repaired by replacin g fractured weld and parent metal with toughness-rated weld filler metal wa s also poor. On the basis of the studies described in the paper, the rotati on capacity of large-size moment-resisting connections built prior to the N orthridge earthquake is smaller than the target values established followin g the earthquake; rehabilitation of earthquake-damaged moment-resisting con nections by re-welding only will likely be ineffective; beam-column panel z ones should be designed to remain elastic for the forces associated with pl astic hinging in the beams; design equations for continuity plates should b e revised; and design checks for flange compactness should be based on expe cted rather than nominal material properties. (C) 1998 John Wiley & Sons, L td.