The federal Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997 recognized that in certa
in egregious circumstances, states need not seek to reunify a family before
terminating the rights of abusive and neglectful parents. Washington State
responded by revising ifs termination of parental rights statute to treat
parents' violent criminal convictions as sole grounds for terminating paren
tal rights. This Comment argues that the Washington statute should be furth
er amended to recognize that a termination of rights to a previous child ma
y serve as grounds for terminating rights to a present child if the State f
inds the parent's continuing behavior puts the child at risk for abuse or n
eglect. Washington courts have already recognized that parents who have mis
treated children are likely to continue to do so. Furthermore, other state
laws that treat prior terminations as sufficient proof of a parent's presen
t unfitness have been justified on public policy grounds and upheld under c
onstitutional scrutiny. This Comment concludes that the proposed statutory
revision is constitutional because the compelling State interest in protect
ing children outweighs the rights of abusive and neglectful parents, and th
e Washington statute is already extremely protective of parents' due proces
s rights.