Although foundry residuals, consisting mostly of waste sands, represent a p
otentially attractive, high-volume resource for beneficial reuse applicatio
ns (e.g. highway embankment construction), prospective end users are unders
tandably concerned about unforeseen liabilities stemming from the use of th
ese residuals. This paper, therefore, focuses on the innovative use of a mi
crobial bioassay as a means of developing a characterization of environment
al suitability extending beyond the analytical coverage already provided by
mandated chemical-specific tests (i.e., TCLP, etc.). Microtox(TM) bioassay
s were conducted on leachates derived from residuals obtained at a wide ran
ge of facilities, including: 11 gray and ductile iron foundries plus one ea
ch steel and aluminum foundries. In addition, virgin sand samples were used
to establish a relative 'natural' benchmark against which the waste foundr
y sands could then be compared in terms of their apparent quality. These bi
oassay tests were able to effectively 'fingerprint' those residuals whose b
ioassay behavior was comparable to that of virgin materials. In fact, the m
ajority of gray and ductile iron foundry residuals tested during this repor
ted study elicited Microtox(R) response levels which fell within or below t
he virgin sand response range, consequently providing another quantifiable
layer of support for this industry's claim that their sands are 'cleaner th
an dirt.' However, negative Microtox(TM) responses beyond that of the virgi
n sands were observed with a number of foundry samples (i.e. four of the 11
gray or ductile iron sands plus both non-iron sands). Therefore, the latte
r results would suggest that these latter residuals be excluded from benefi
cial reuse for the immediate future, at least until the cause and nature of
this negative response has been further identified. (C) 1998 Elsevier Scie
nce Ltd. All rights reserved.