M. Hayashi et al., Suppression of seasonal increase in serum interleukin-5 is linked to the clinical efficacy of immunotherapy for seasonal allergic rhinitis, ACT OTO-LAR, 1998, pp. 133-142
Although immunotherapy is recognized as a highly effective form of treatmen
t for allergic rhinitis; especially pollen-induced seasonal allergic rhinit
is, the mechanisms have not been fully established. In the present study, w
e investigated whether immunotherapy could affect the seasonal increase in
interleukin-5 (IL-5) in the serum of patients with seasonal allergic rhinit
is and whether the effect on IL-5 in serum is related to the clinical effic
acy of immunotherapy. Venous blood was collected twice from each patient wi
th seasonal allergic rhinitis due to Japanese cedar pollens, before and dur
ing the cedar pollen season in 1997, to determine the cedar pollen-specific
IgE and IL-5 in serum. Both specific ISE and IL-5 in serum were significan
tly increased during the pollen season, not only in the poor responders to
antihistamines but also in the good responders. Neither the rate of seasona
l increase in specific IgE nor the rate of seasonal increase in IL-5 differ
ed significantly between the good responders and the poor responders to ant
ihistamines. Both specific IgE and IL-5 were significantly increased during
the pollen season in the poor responders to immunotherapy, whereas neither
specific ISE nor IL-5 was increased during the pollen season in the good r
esponders to immunotherapy. The rate of seasonal increase in specific IgE a
s well as IL-5 was significantly smaller in the good responders than in the
poor responders to immunotherapy. The rates of seasonal increase in specif
ic IgE and in IL-5 were inversely correlated with the length of time on imm
unotherapy. However, the rare of seasonal increase in specific IgE was not
significantly correlated with the rate of seasonal increase in IL-5. In con
clusion, the suppression of the seasonal increase in IL-5 in serum is a wor
king mechanism of immunotherapy related to the clinical efficacy of the tre
atment.