Njm. Opdam et al., Class I occlusal composite resin restorations: In vivo post-operative sensitivity, wall adaptation, and microleakage, AM J DENT, 11(5), 1998, pp. 229-234
Purpose: To investigate the effect of restoration technique and adhesive sy
stem on the post-operative sensitivity and marginal adaptation of Class I o
cclusal composite resin restorations placed in vivo. Materials and Methods:
48 Class I cavities were restored in vivo according to one of three protoc
ols: (1) Scotchbond MultiPurpose/P50 placed in increments; (2) Scotchbond M
ulti-Burpose/P50 placed in bulk, and (3) Clearfil Liner Bond 2/Clearfil Ray
Posterior placed in bulk. Post-operative sensitivity and sensitivity on lo
ading were recorded 5-7 weeks after placement of the restorations; the teet
h were cautiously extracted, immersed in a dye solution and sectioned. SEM
observations were made from epoxy resin replicas. Microleakage and gap form
ation was assessed. Results: No differences among adhesive systems or resto
ration procedures were found for microleakage. Post-operative sensitivity w
as reported in 14% of all teeth but was absent in the Clearfil Liner Bond 2
group. Sensitivity on loading was experienced by patients in 56% of the re
storations. Group 1: nine teeth; Group 2: 15 teeth; Group 3: three teeth. D
ifferences were statistically significant for all three groups. The SEM ana
lysis showed that restorations placed in two layers showed less gaps than r
estorations placed in bulk.